Why Casey Anthony Trial Provokes Questions about American Legal System
Accused Mom Casey Anthony |
For instance, I just don't see why the lawyers in the case would bicker over what proven evidence should be withheld from the jury, if the court's goal is to find out what really happened to the little girl. Her skull and bones were found five months after the mother claimed a (non-existent) Mexican nanny ran off with the child. Legal observers now say that if the defense attorney's story of the child having accidentally drowned doesn't stick, then he will merely have to put back on his thinking-cap and come up with another tale.
Are court cases like this merely pre-casted reality tv? Or does American society actually care to find out whether this woman killed her child? Perhaps a system such as ours that gives such casual regard to what actually happened as opposed to what procedures were followed, explains why so many minorities on death row have had to rely on DNA evidence to absolve them of crimes they did not commit.
RELATED POST: Casey Anthony Acquittal Raises Question: Is Trial by Jury Expensive but Medieval Anachronism?
Comments
My guess is that lawyers are frightened by there own law system that they attempt to follow.
Peace&Love,
Brooke